MAIN OFFICE:
12
North Route 17,
P.O. Box 1827
Paramus, New Jersey 07653-1827
Phone: (201)587-0888
Fax: (201)587-8845
Email: attorney@wellslaw.com
SATELLITE
OFFICES:
New York City Law Office
1040 Avenue of the Americas - 24th Flr.
New York, NY 10018
(212) 847-9560
Morristown, New Jersey Law Office
55 Madison Avenue, Suite 400
Morristown, NJ 07960
(973) 285-3360
Bristol, Vermont Law Office
25 D Main Street
Bristol, VT 05443
Phone: (802)453-5765
Fax: (802) 329-2100
Lyndhurst, New Jersey Law Office
10 Stuyvesant Ave
Lyndhurst, New Jersey 07071
(201) 531-8989
Tuckerton, New Jersey Law Office
149 E. Main Street,
Tuckerton, New Jersey
08087
(609) 296-6666
Click here for Directions |
Communication Is Key!
By: Sylvia Hall, Esq.
During my short term at Wells, Jaworski & Liebman, LLP, I have learned that a good lawyer needs to be keenly attuned to our client's needs. We often spend hours with clients to determine their various goals and discuss the development of their cases.
With respect to litigation, during the course of the development of a case, it is often necessary to speak with a client about a new development or the necessity of discovery production. Thus, frequent client contact and meetings become imperative. New Jersey Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 1.4(b) requires that a lawyer keep a client “reasonably informed about the status of a matter and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information.” In the Litigation Department, this means contacting a client regarding court dates and sudden developments of a case.
In addition, section 1.4(c) states, “A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation”, and RPC 1.2 states, “A lawyer shall abide by a client's decision concerning the scope and objectives of representation . . . and . . . shall consult with the client about the means to pursue them. A lawyer may take such action on behalf of the client as is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation.”
When reading both sections 1.4 and 1.2 of the RPC, one may make an analogy to “informed consent” as it pertains to doctors and surgeons. Here, at WJ&L, we strive to inform clients of the benefits and pitfalls of a specific course of action and of possible outcomes according to strategies. It is as if the case is the patient, we are the surgeons and the informed consent is given by a client. Through communication - phone calls, e-mails and meetings - we are confident that a client's consent is voluntary, informed and intelligent.
At WJ&L, we pride ourselves on teamwork, and that includes client participation. We also like it when clients are well informed because they provide useful dialogue and feedback. In litigation, they see what one may call “layman's nuisances”, which allow us to see cases in multi-dimensional ways. Clients seem to appreciate that at WJ&L, we do not work in an isolated void but rather share ideas. Communication is key!
Sylvia Hall is an Associate at WJ&L and actively practices in our Litigation Department.
|